So apparently people have been interpreting this picture in a different way than what I expected.
The original intent of this picture was to say that someone’s arousal (In this case a male bodied person) does not mean that they have consented to sex. This was supposed to acknowledge that men are raped, to combat people saying ‘how could she rape him, he clearly wanted it, he had an erection”
Others have seen this as saying that just because you are aroused by someone does not give you permission to have sex with them. I agree with this. This is a good sentiment. If this is what you got out of this picture, that’s fine. This was just an unexpected interpretation.
one time in 9th grade biology, we were being separated into groups by birth month. half of the class was born in september (including me), and so when we were standing as a group of about 15 compared to the other groups of 2-4, our teacher looked us dead in the eyes and said wow your parents really knew how to celebrate christmas and regrouped us